Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On December 26, 2012, the Plaintiff joined the Defendant Company as the head of the Financial Accounting Team and worked until February 12, 2014.
B. On March 28, 2013, the Plaintiff and the Defendant: (a) the period of exercising Stockholm options under Article 3 (Period and Conditions of Exercise of Stockholm) (the Plaintiff) of Article 2 (Number of Stocks Assigned to Stockholm) 10,000 per share of 4,686 won (the Stockholm) as follows; (b) the period of exercising Stockholm options is from March 28, 2015 to March 27, 2020; (c) the officer shall be in office as of the date of exercising Stockholm options; (d) the officer shall be in office as of March 28, 2015; and (e) the officer may exercise Stockholm options during the period of exercise where he/she retires or retires from office as an officer; and (e) his/her heir may exercise the Stockholm options when he/she dies, as prescribed by the articles of incorporation (other than the Stockholm).
C. On February 12, 2014, the Plaintiff visited the Defendant’s representative director and did not work at the Defendant Company after leaving the office.
On February 20, 2014, the defendant shall be deemed to be retired ipso facto in any of the following cases where a member under Articles 18 (5) and 18 (ipso facto retirement) of the Personnel Management Regulations of the defendant was absent from office for six consecutive days:
5. If a person is absent from office for at least six consecutive days or for at least 20 days a year, the person dismissed the Plaintiff and notified the Plaintiff thereof.
In addition, on April 11, 2014, the defendant opened a board of directors to resolve to cancel the granting of stock options to the plaintiff on the ground of the plaintiff's retirement.
The plaintiff was dismissed from the defendant, and on March 24, 2014, the plaintiff was dismissed from the defendant.