1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Comprehensively taking into account the purport of the argument as to the cause of the claim Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 4 and Eul's evidence Nos. 3 (including branch numbers), the defendant entered into a contract to purchase KRW 25 million from D on September 1, 2009, and paid KRW 1.5 million out of D on the same day. The plaintiff was issued an order to attach and assign the remainder claim against the defendant on August 25, 2010, 201 to 20,000,000 won (hereinafter "the claim of this case"), and the defendant was issued an order to collect and assign the remainder claim against D on 201,00,000 won (hereinafter "the claim of this case"), and the defendant was issued an order to collect and assign the remainder claim against the defendant on 201,000 won (the debtor of this case); on the one hand, 201,000 won (the defendant, who is the debtor of this case); on September 16, 20101, 2015.

2. Judgment on the defendant's defense

A. The defendant asserts that D is unable to comply with the plaintiff's claim since D is defective in maintaining D's contract instead of giving up the remainder of the contract, because it delayed the performance of the above contract and caused considerable damage to D, and D's maintenance of the contract instead of giving up the remainder of the contract.

However, there is no evidence to prove that D has agreed to waive the remainder claim under the above sales contract, which is the cause of the claim for seizure and the defendant.

Rather, Gap evidence No. 4-5.