logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원(제주) 2015.04.15 2014나637
공사대금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against Plaintiff C that orders payment under the following subparagraphs shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The grounds for the court’s explanation concerning the claims of Plaintiff A, B, and Cheong Fisheries are as stated in the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(2) As seen below, the part concerning the claim by Plaintiff C does not affect the part concerning the claim by the above plaintiffs even if the judgment of the court below and some of the non-paid part of the construction cost are different as to the payment

A. The court's explanation concerning this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the alteration or supplement as follows. Thus, this part of the judgment is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. According to the amended part of the first instance court's judgment regarding Q Q, the Defendant agreed to transfer Nos. 22, 14 through 18, 25, 16 through 21, 28, 9 through 29, 30, 10, and 15) the summary of the Defendant's assertion to the head of X bears the obligation to pay for the goods worth KRW 197,100,000 to the representative Q, and the Defendant agreed to transfer No. 102, 502 of the instant house to Q Q 12, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 300, 200, 300, 200, 300, 200, 30, 200, 20, 30, 200, 20, 20, 30, 20, 30, 20, 200, 3, 2.

arrow