1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine; 50.

Punishment of the crime

On October 31, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 01:20, Kimhae-si B apartment 110 dong 1206, and called out as domestic violence, and (b) in order for the Defendant to separate the Defendant and his wife F, a slope D to the Defendant and his wife; (c) a slope E to the Defendant and his wife; (d) a slope E to the Defendant and his wife; (c) a slope E continued to have his wife F enter the room in his state of interest; and (d) the Defendant forced the Defendant to go back to his wife F.

The Defendant: (a) laid down her wife F with his her her her her her her her f, “Aropical defect, police her fropher,” and pushed her her fropher’s frophing to commit an assault; and (b) her frophing her frophing theory, such as “Aroph froph, this frophing, and her frophing,” and her frophing the frophing her frophing her frophing with the frophing her frophing of the froph.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers who have been handling reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of D and F;

1. Report on the use of police gear;

1. Application of photographic Acts and subordinate statutes (victim sloped);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.