Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that the defendant does not infringe the defendant's right of defense, part of the facts charged is a person who acts as a melting intermediary, C is a person who acts as a melting intermediary, and victim D is a person who operates melting and other herb products delivery companies in the name of "F" in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu.

Defendant

And C conspiredd the victim to take melting the victim even though the victim did not have the ability or intent to pay the melting price.

On May 12, 2014, the Defendant introduced the victim's office to the victim's end-to-door that C is a person who melts in the victim's office, and C delivers melt to the third floor house, and upon delivery of melts in credit, C pays all existing transaction cases at the following transaction.

“A false statement” was received from the injured party the use of 7,460,000 won equivalent to the market price.

In addition, on May 15, 2014, the Defendant, and C, at the above office, are deemed to have been melted by the victim.

In addition, the payment will be made in a lump sum after entering into the delivery place and after entering into the delivery place.

“The parts of this case were delivered 4,269,000 won from the injured party.”

As a result, the defendant and C conspired to obtain a total of 11,729,000 won from the damaged person through two times.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspect C by the police (including D statements);

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Copies of the details of each transaction, and the application of statutes;

1. Article 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;