1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

(1) Article 3 of the contract of this case provides that when the contract of this case is completed with a new limitation of right, the defendant and the designated person shall deposit the remainder of the contract of this case with the court and cancel the registration of restriction of right. Article 8 of the same provision provides that the defendant and the designated person shall settle the above restriction of right through deposit and consultation. Thus, the defendant and the designated person shall not be deemed to have a prior obligation to cancel the registration of restriction of right before the remainder of the contract is paid by the plaintiffs. This part of the plaintiffs' assertion on the different premise is without merit. The plaintiff's remaining argument of this part is without merit even if considering the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court of first instance, and the evidence submitted in the trial is added to the evidence submitted by the court of first instance. Thus, the plaintiffs' claim should be dismissed because it is without merit. The judgment of the first instance is just as this conclusion, and the judgment of the court of first instance shall dismiss the plaintiffs' appeal as per Disposition.