1. The defendant is against the plaintiff,

(a) the delivery of each building listed in the separate sheet;

(b) from February 12, 2015, the delivery of each of the above buildings.

1. The facts following the facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged by comprehensively considering the whole purport of the pleadings in Gap evidence 1-1 to 11, evidence 2-1 to 3-5, evidence 3-1 to 5, evidence 6-1, evidence 6-2, evidence 10-1, evidence 2, evidence 13-1 to 10, evidence 14-1, 2, evidence 15-18, evidence 15-1, and evidence 1, evidence 1, evidence 15-18, evidence 1, evidence 1, evidence 2-1 to 12, and evidence 1, evidence 2-1 to 2-12, and evidence 5-1 to 12 are insufficient.

1) The Plaintiff’s land registration conversion and division and merger details 1) The Plaintiff shall be 3,00 m2 (hereinafter “D before annexation”) for a factory site in Macheon-si; and when the land is specified in below, it shall be specified only by the lot number.

(2) On May 4, 2007, G forest land became 2843 square meters due to registration conversion, and on May 30, 2007, 165 square meters among them became 165 square meters of H forest land.

G Land has been changed to land for a factory since then, and was merged into D land on June 30, 2015.

3) F land was divided on January 7, 2015, and 4,493 square meters of I forest land was 4,493 square meters. The I land became 4,386 square meters of J factory land due to registration conversion and land category change, and was combined into D land prior to the annexation on June 30, 2015. (4) The D land prior to the annexation was 2,678 square meters of G factory site, J factory site, 4,386 square meters and D factory site was 10,065 square meters of land due to the annexation with D factory site on June 30, 2015.

B. On February 10, 2007, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant. On February 10, 2007, the Plaintiff is between the Defendant and K, and 2,621 square meters out of D land and E land before the merger, and F land (hereinafter “instant land”).

(2) On December 30, 2009, the lease contract was implicitly renewed after December 30, 2009, when the lease contract was concluded with K, the Plaintiff terminated the lease contract with K.