The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (one year and six months of imprisonment) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the judgment of the defendant recognized and reflected the crime, and the driving distance is not relatively less than 100 meters, are favorable to the defendant.

However, in full view of the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., as well as the fact that the Defendant had been punished twice due to drinking driving, but was engaged in driving at once, and had a high alcohol concentration during blood, and committed the instant crime during the suspension of the execution period due to this type of crime, etc., the Defendant’s punishment cannot be deemed unfair because the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, in light of all other factors of sentencing as indicated in the pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.