1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The Defendant’s revocation of the registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on June 11, 2010.

1. The part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance excluding the conclusion among the reasons to be explained by the court concerning this case excluding the conclusion is as follows. Except for the part of the judgment of the court of first instance 3 through No. 421, the part of the judgment 3 through No. 421 is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of

2. Parts to be dried;

C. (1) Where there is a defect in an administrative act, the agency which has conducted the administrative act may revoke it on its own even without a separate legal basis; however, where the agency cancels the beneficial administrative disposition, it may revoke it only when it is so strong that the public interest needs to be revoked by comparing and comparing the necessity of the public interest to be revoked, the right to obtain benefits to be suffered by the parties due to such revocation, and the infringement of the protection of trust and the stability of legal life, etc., and to justify

I would like to say.

(2) Article 4(1)14 of the Act on Persons of Distinguished Service to the State (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2003Du4669, May 25, 2006) provides that “A person who retired from office after suffering from wounds in the line of duty as a public official (excluding military personnel and police officers) provided for in Article 2 of the State Public Officials Act and Article 2 of the Local Public Officials Act, or as an employee prescribed by Presidential Decree who ordinarily engages in official duties in the State or a local government (including illness in the line of duty), who is judged to have suffered physical disability falling within that degree of injury provided for in Article 6-4 in the physical examination conducted by the Minister of Patriots and Veterans Affairs,” and Article 73-2(1)14 of the same Act provides that “A person who meets the requirements, such as Article 4(1)14 of the same Act, and who suffers from wounds due to his/her own negligence or due to a concurrent cause, without