logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.08.08 2016고단3904
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동주거침입)
Text

Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. Defendant A, who had been sentenced to a fine of two million won due to interference with business affairs at the Daejeon District Court on October 27, 1999 by the former chairperson of the Association E, Defendant A, who was sentenced to a fine of one million won due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. (joint residence intrusion) at the Daejeon District Court on May 7, 2015 by the Secretary General of the Association, Defendant B is a fine of one million won due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. (joint residence intrusion) at the Daejeon District Court on December 19, 201, a fine of seven hundred thousand won due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residence intrusion) on December 19, 201, and Defendant C is the Director General of the Association Policy Bureau of E.

E Union, which consists of workers belonging to government-invested and funded research institutes, has been opposed to the introduction and expansion of wage skin system at government-invested and funded research institutes located in Daejeon among the government-invested and funded research institutes in the latter part of the second half of 2015, tried to stop the introduction of wage skin system by forcing the government-invested and funded research institutes to visit and interview with the head of the agency, to hold out interviews with the head of the agency, or to stop the introduction of wage skin system when refusing to meet with the head of the agency's visit and interview with the head of the agency, to hold the head of the agency's interview with the head of the agency.

B. On October 7, 2015, at the meeting of the Chairman of the F Research Institute around 09:00, Defendant C, along with two members of the F Research Institute and two members of the F Research Institute, shall hear the explanation that the suspension of the procedure for the introduction of the wage cream system was requested, but the procedure cannot be suspended, and explain it to Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant B, and other members of the private sector, and the head interview and the head interview as described in the above paragraph 1.

arrow