logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.01.14 2015고단667
식품위생법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than five months and by a fine not exceeding five thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from November 27, 2012 to February 23, 2014, operated “E”, a factory for salting in Asan City, from around 27, 2012, to around 23, 2014. A person who, from around February 24, 2014, changed the trade name from the same place to “F” and changed the business operator to G as the Defendant’s wife.

A business operator who manufactures or processes food shall not display, keep, or sell products, the distribution deadline of which expires for sale, or use such products for manufacturing or processing food, etc.

Nevertheless, from September 17, 2013 to April 8, 2014, the Defendant sold 65 sets of “Hlumed fish (10km)” to Don and retail chain I, etc., where the distribution period had elapsed from the above F to the above F, and stored 15 copies for sales purposes.

[2015 Highest 897] The Defendant is a person who operates a salted fish distribution and selling company in the trade name of “E” in ASEAN.

Defendant, at the end of June 2014, by the High Court of Daejeon District Court Decision 2014No542, J (hereinafter referred to as “J”) of the same year by the High Court of Daejeon District Court of Justice (hereinafter referred to as “J”).

3. 13. 13. An indication of the seizure of the movable property at the market price of 85,00,000,000 won, such as the salted 35 mart (one nives), the salted 48 macks (2 nives), the salted 128 macks (3 nives), the salted 357 macks, the electric knives, and the knives of the instant movable property (hereinafter “the instant movable property”), which was stored in the instant E, was placed on the corporeal movable at the level of 35,000,00 won (hereinafter “the instant movable”), and the creditor hacks fishery cooperative removed the effect of the instant movable property from the Gwangju District Court’s Mapo-2014 Ka 730,000 (hereinafter “the instant seizure order”).

Summary of Evidence

[2015 Highest 667]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Investigation report (on-site results of seizure);

1. Each internal investigation report [2015 order 897].

arrow