The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit after filing the appeal shall consist of the principal lawsuit and counterclaims.

1. The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justifiable even if all the evidence

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the following modifications. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. (1) During the third fourth parallel of the judgment of the court of first instance, “the vehicle of the Plaintiff was collisioned” in the 7th parallel between “the Defendant vehicle” and “the same side of the 7th parallel of the 1st parallel of the 3rd parallel of the 1st parallel of the 1st parallel of the 1st parallel of the 1st parallel of the 1st parallel of the 1st parallel of the 3th parallel of the 1st parallel of the 1st parallel of the 1st parallel of the 1st parallel of the 1st parallel of the 2018 parallel of the 1st parallel of the 1st parallel of the 1st parallel of the 1st parallel of the 1st parallel of the 1st parallel of the 1st parallel of the 1st parallel of the 1st parallel of the 3th parallel of the 1st parallel of the 3th parallel of the 1st parallel of the 3th parallel of the 1st parallel of the Plaintiff vehicle.”

(2) Under the third and third sides of the judgment of the first instance, the term “paid” was revised to read “the Defendant paid KRW 21,209,310 as the Defendant paid the Defendant’s automobile insurance contract for the Defendant’s vehicle (in particular, whether the Defendant did not dispute the amount that the Defendant paid to K for the third driver’s vehicle).”

(3) Under the fifth and fourth of the judgment of the court of first instance, the amendment is made to “a citing in the grounds”.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.