beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Justice] On February 6, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Jeju District Court, and completed the enforcement of the sentence in the Jeju Prison on November 25, 2014.
【Criminal Facts】
1. On January 11, 2015, around 22:30 on January 11, 2015, the defrauded: (a) around the E entertainment tavern operated by the victim D in Jeju-si; and (b) the facts are the same as if the victim would pay the drinking value to the victim although there is no intention or ability to pay the drinking value; and (c) the subject of such order was received from the victim with the sum of KRW 370,00,000, including two weeks and one week, and the subject of such order.
2. On January 23, 2015, around 17:30 on January 23, 2015, the defrauded: (a) around 17:30 of the Victim G operation in Jeju-si; (b) the Defendant, despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the alcohol value, was engaged in the act as if the Defendant would pay the victim the alcohol value; and (c) ordered the alcohol and the alcohol, etc.; and (d) the Defendant, who is affiliated with the order, obtained the victim with the sum of KRW 245,00,000,000,000
3. On January 29, 2015, the defrauded: (a) around 03:30 on January 29, 2015, the Defendant: (b) at K Amusement tavern operated by the Victim J, the Defendant: (c) around Jeju on January 29, 2015; and (d) despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the drinking value, the Defendant was aware that the Defendant would pay the drinking value to the victim; and (c) ordered the drinking and drinking, etc.; and (d) the Defendant was obtained from the victim with the sum of KRW 400,00
4. On January 31, 2015, around 20:00 on January 31, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 20:00, the Defendant: (b) was provided with a total sum of KRW 500,00,00,00 from the victim’s entertainment bars in Jeju L; (c) the fact was that the Defendant had no intent or ability to pay the drinking value to the victim; and (d) the Defendant, despite having no intention or capacity to pay the drinking value, ordered the victim to provide alcohol and alcohol; and (c) the Defendant
5. On January 12, 2015, the Defendant, who interfered with business, demanded the victim D to calculate the drinking value at E entertainment tavern as indicated in paragraph (1).