logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.02.17 2015고합1208
부정처사후수뢰
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and six months, and a fine of forty thousand won.

The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Of the facts charged, the part of the facts charged, which is not directly related to the elements for the establishment of the crime of ex post facto bribery, was deleted.

The Defendant, who entered F around February 21, 201, served as the head of the audit committee of G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) from February 21, 201 to December 31, 201, and was assigned as H officer from January 1, 2012 to December 13, 2013, and served as H I.

Since then, on January 13, 2014, the Defendant was elected from the J Representative Election and served as the J Representative Director from March 21, 2014, the Defendant is a person who has overall control over internal and external duties, personnel affairs and financial affairs of executives and employees belonging thereto, and supervised and supervised G affairs in which H has invested by 100%.

The defendant was appointed as the representative of J and was aware that he was working for F on September 2014, 2014.

During the process of dividing K's only one story, K had talked to the effect that it will help K to conduct L business.

After that, K can deliver L through the Defendant.

I think, I introduced the L supplier through the seal to receive the L supplier's L "M" from the L supplier, and then asked the Defendant to keep the data related to "M" on the spot around October 2014, and “M” to be well examined.

Upon K’s request, the Defendant directed G officials to the effect that “M” materials should be dryed and actively examined L selection and delivery. G officials decided to receive “M” products according to the Defendant’s direction, and reported this to the Defendant, and then began to receive “M” delivery from around November 2014, by concluding a supply contract with N Co., Ltd., Ltd., which is substantially operated by K and “M” with the Defendant.

K continuously received the product “O” from L suppliers with the intent to supply L in addition to the Defendant’s supply via the Defendant, and the Defendant’s “O”-related data and “O” are well-known.

arrow