The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. Although the court below acquitted the victim of the charges of this case on the charge of this case, although the defendant could have sold the victim with the company company M26 country company and large trees in Korea instead of M26 country company company company and large company company, the court below acquitted the victim of the charges of this case. The court below erred in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: (a) the Defendant sought the Victim E from D located in the Sung-gun of Seongbuk-gun of Seongbuk-gun on March 2013, 201 and sought from the Victim E “M26 State M26 State M26 State Industrial Complex.”

“The victim is the director of the State of M26 and the director of the State of M26.”

The term “the instant seedlings” was false, and sold 650 weeks and bamboo trees (hereinafter referred to as “the instant seedlings”).

However, among the past and past 150 weeks, the Defendant was not “M26 country history and large trees” but “SHW6 country history and large trees,” and most seedlings were low to the extent that most seedlings were to be dead after one year. It was 1.5 million M26 country history and large trees.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 6.5 million won from the victim as the purchase price.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to acquire the money of the victim.

B. In light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged in accordance with the records of this case, the lower court’s judgment: (a) it is difficult to believe that E’s statement was in fact; and (b) previously ordered the Defendant prior to E’s finding in D.

M26 If the Defendant demanded to change the country’s mountain sHW6’s company and large trees into the country’s company and large trees, the Defendant’s statement alone is insufficient to recognize the instant facts charged on the ground that there is no need to mention or explain the fact that the Defendant sold the company and large trees from D to E, and that there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

① At the time of the purchase of seedlings of this case, E was a member of the H Association, and at the time, SHW6.