The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant did not inflict any injury on the victim D, who is a type, as shown in the judgment of the court below, and that as at the time D was heard from the defendant as to why why he would be the defendant's mother G, the defendant was killed, and even though he was guilty, the judgment of the court below erred by mistake of facts.

B. The sentence (700,000 won of fine) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The part of the lower court’s assertion of mistake of facts is based on the evidence duly adopted and examined and the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence, namely, that is, D, an investigative agency: (a) stated that “the Defendant was able to take bather and fat down fats without any justifiable reason; (b) the Defendant got her arms into the stairs; and (c) the lower court stated that “the Defendant was fating fats and fats down on the floor; (d) the Defendant was fatd and fated; (c) the Defendant was fatd and fated. The Defendant got her mother and fatd in a way that he was fated.” The Defendant’s mother and fat fats and fats were fatd in the process of leading him to his house, and the Defendant also made a consistent statement to the effect that he was fatd in excess of D’s shape or fating part.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion of mistake is without merit.

B. The part of the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing did not have any record of punishment for the same crime before, and the defendant at the time led to the crime of this case by bullying the defendant's mother.