logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.04.25 2012고정2871
자동차관리법위반
Text

The Defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment of this case is publicly notified.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person driving a B-Scar car.

No one shall operate a motor vehicle with knowledge that its structure, structure, etc. has been modified without obtaining approval from the head of the competent Gu.

Nevertheless, on March 2010, the Defendant, without obtaining the approval of the competent head of the Gu, removed Bracks, etc. from the front side of a motor vehicle in the Seoul Western-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and changed the structure of the motor vehicle by attaching LED, etc. to the motor vehicle. On April 2010, 2010, the Defendant removed the last part of the engine from the commercial parts of the motor vehicle parts located in the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Head of the Gu, and changed the structure of the motor vehicle by attaching 2 a

2. Determination

A. According to Article 34(1) of the Automobile Management Act, Article 8(2)12 and 14 of the Enforcement Decree of the Automobile Management Act, and Article 55(1) of the Enforcement Rule of the Automobile Management Act, where the owner of a motor vehicle intends to alter a noise prevention device among the structures and devices of the motor vehicle, such as headlights, headlights, tail lights, tail lights, brake lights, brake lights, sidelights, backlights, and other light devices, he/she shall obtain approval from the head of a Si/Gun/Gu

B. We examine the instant case. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the Defendant replaced the B-to-car car side of the Defendant’s own B-to-car car with PED, etc. on March 2010, and the Defendant removed the noise prevention device of the said car on April 2010, and attached two exhausters purchased by the Defendant on the part. However, even though the Defendant was found to have removed the aforementioned hub, etc., the Defendant attached PED, etc. manufactured by the said car manufacturer’s self-certification at the same location after removal of the aforementioned hub, etc., and either changed the said car itself or separately attached parts.

arrow