The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000 (per million), and if the above fine is not paid, KRW 100,000 (per million).

Punishment of the crime

No person shall defame any third person by disclosing any fact, false fact, openly through an information and communications network with intent to defame any third person, with an intention to defame any third person.

Nevertheless, on December 3, 2015, the Defendant, at the office of the D Specialized Driving School located in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, by using computers, connects the victim company of D Specialized Driving School in the evaluation bulletin board of the D Specialized Driving School for Large Motor Vehicle Driving in the Internet NAVV, Inc. by using computers, to the “F” of D Specialized Driving School E in the author’s letter E, “The degree of losses even during the evaluation.”

It shall be close to each other.

Now there are comments on the comments that are fluent under the supervision, and that the class of driving on the road is two times every three hours, and the 40 minutes begins later, and the 40 minutes ends, and the running of the mama course is Hand, brokes and brokes during the time.

I have the right to take an examination after two different classes have been given.

A person, other than a driver's career, shall be replaced by a person who is unable to be accompanied by his/her father.

The expression "Refluence" is a fluence of vehicles and horses.

Neither the office nor the character of written education is a kind of fresh and time.

Irrely Irrevill myself

The phrase “ .......” was written.

However, the Defendant, as a driving technician of D Specialized Driving Schools, was raising a lot of music in the company evaluation windows to which he belongs, while being posted a good writing in the evaluation windows of the victim company, and posted false facts by copying the music posted in another specialized driving school as it was and attaching it to the evaluation windows of the victim company, and there was no fact that the victim company received education.

Accordingly, the Defendant posted public false information through information and communication network to defame the victim company, thereby impairing the honor of the victim company.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;