1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff’s assertion that, upon receiving a request from Nonparty C, the head of the Plaintiff, who was in office as a director of the Defendant corporation, lent KRW 50,000,00 to the Defendant on June 4, 2015, the Plaintiff is claiming the return of the loan to the Defendant on the ground that it is evident that the Plaintiff deemed the other party to the loan for consumption to be the Defendant, and that at the time D, the Plaintiff exercised the authority as a lawful representative at the time of the Plaintiff’s exercise of the right as the president (the suspension of performance of duties on July 3, 2015, which was the day before the Suwon District Court Decision 2014Kahap544, supra).

Judgment

With regard to the plaintiff's assertion that it is the establishment of a monetary loan contract, it is not enough to recognize only the statement of Gap evidence 1 to 11.

The plaintiff's claim shall not be accepted because there is no other proof.