The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (five million won penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant, who recognized the instant crime as a primary offender, is against the Defendant, is a favorable sentencing condition for the Defendant.

However, in full view of the following circumstances, the act of arranging sexual traffic is deemed unfair because of the lack of social harm, such as the commercialization of women's sex and harm to the sound sexual culture and good morals, and thus, requires strict punishment. In full view of equity in sentencing with similar similar cases, and other various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing specified in this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the above unfair argument by the defendant is rejected.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.