Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. Injury to or interference with business affairs of victims C;

A. On September 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) suffered injury on the part of the fingers and tensions in need of treatment for approximately three weeks in 20:10 on September 22, 2017, when the credit card presented in the purchase of clothes and bags at the “E” store operated by the Defendant (E, 57 years of age) was stolen and lost; and (b) the payment was refused; (c) the Defendant suffered injury on the part of the fingers and tensions in need of treatment for about three weeks in non-freshion.

B. On September 22, 2017, from around 19:30 to around 20:10 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the business, in the clothes of the above “E”, and for the foregoing reason, the Defendant sent money to the Defendant who displayed his resident registration certificate even if the card was stolen and reported in the New Cooperatives and Nonghyup.

“I,” “I, I, F clothes, I, Doll, I, Doll, I, see why the four years would be why I,

“Along with the high lusium, the disturbance obstructed the operation of the victim C’s clothes by force.

2. On September 26, 2017, around 11:30 on September 26, 2017, the Defendant damaged the victim G’s property. At the street store operated by the victim G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the light of the victim’s demand for the reduction of the price and the demand for the reduction of the price was not taken place, the Defendant cut

3. Obstruction of duties to victims I and J, injury, or damage to property;

A. On September 27, 2017, from around 13:03 to 13:19, the Defendant sought to pay hearing aid costs as 36 months at the upper point of “L” operated by the victim I in the Gancho-gun of Gyeongbuk-gun, the Defendant sought to pay the hearing aid costs as 36 months. However, on the ground that the Defendant was refused, the Defendant’s refusal to pay 36 months’ portion of “the 36 months’ portion of the hearing aid is without merit

“Along with a large interest,” 112, intending to take the mobile phone of the employee J who sought to report 112, and intending to take the glass table back, thereby obstructing the victim I’s hearing aid sales by force.

B. The Defendant (1) on September 28, 2017.