logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.12.14 2016가단339784
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The Defendant: KRW 26,875,694 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from March 18, 2015 to December 14, 2017.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an employee of Dalk Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Dalk”), and B&T Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B&T”) is a corporation established for the purpose of electric design construction business, etc., and the Defendant is a corporation established for the purpose of producing and selling electronic, electricity, machinery and appliances, and parts and accessories thereof.

B. On March 10, 2015, the Defendant contracted the arrangement work of the Defendant’s Busan place of business, such as electric wires, pipes, etc., located in Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, Busan Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Seoul Metropolitan City Green Industry”) with the Busan Metropolitan City’s place of business, and the cleaning work of facilities, respectively.

C. On March 18, 2015, while cleaning press machine at the Defendant’s workplace, the Plaintiff was injured by damage, such as damage to the left side by cutting off air strings by workers B, who work for the employees B, who work for the employees B, to adjust the air string of press machines, and reducing the length of strings, and the Plaintiff operated the press machine on the wind connecting the press valves, thereby causing damage to the left side by sticking the press machine on the left side.

(hereinafter “instant disaster”). D.

The Plaintiff received, respectively, KRW 21,153,60 of temporary layoff benefits, medical care benefits of KRW 12,047,120, and disability benefits of KRW 29,156,600, based on the period of medical care, from March 18, 2015 to June 20, 2016, upon receiving the determination of an industrial accident from the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service due to the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 5, 7 and 9, each entry and video (including branch numbers, if any) of the evidence No. 1 to 4, 7 and 9, Eul's testimony and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1 of the parties concerned: (a) the Defendant contracted the rearrangement work, including the cleaning work and the electrical equipment, to DNA and its sub-border; and (b) designated the work area and ordered specific work contents; and (c) the relationship between the Defendant and the contractor, as well as the relationship between the Defendant and the contractor, is substantially the same as the relationship between the employer and the employee.

arrow