logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.07.09 2019나88545
대여금
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff falling under the subsequent order of payment shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff (the plaintiff 1963) was the representative director of Q Q Co., Ltd. (the defendant 1983, Sep. 25, 2009) who operated the manufacturing of clothing goods and wholesale retail business. The defendant (the plaintiff and the defendant held shares issued in 1983) who was a shareholder of the above company (the plaintiff and the defendant held 5:5) and the auditor (the auditor had resigned in March 31, 2019) who was paid monthly wages from the non-party 1 company (the defendant seems to work unfairly in the above company). The plaintiff was 30 years of borrowing money from the non-party 1 and U.S. 2 (the defendant's U) who was an employee of the same industry and 30 days of borrowing money from the plaintiff 1 to the above 30 days of borrowing money from the plaintiff 2's insurance company (the defendant's 30 days of borrowing money from the plaintiff 3's insurance company or his administrator, and the plaintiff was allowed to buy money from the above 3 insurance company or his sales business.

arrow