1. The Defendant is limited to the gift made on March 27, 2012 to the Plaintiff B and C on the real estate listed in the attached list 1.

1. Determination as to Plaintiff A’s claim

A. Basic facts 1) Plaintiff A is the mother of the Defendant. 2) Attached Table 2

On December 17, 1985, the registration of transfer of ownership due to the gift made on December 6, 1985 before the defendant on December 17, 1985 and the attached list 2 C.

On November 10, 1998, the registration of transfer of ownership due to donation on November 7, 1998, the real estate listed in the Schedule 1, and the Schedule 2, as to the real estate listed in the paragraph

(a).

On September 9, 2000, the registration of the transfer of co-owners' shares was completed on August 2, 2000 on the real estate stated in the port.

3 The defendant on March 27, 2012 between the plaintiff E and the real estate listed in attached Table 1 and attached Table 2

(a).

I prepared a written agreement to confirm that each of the real estate mentioned in paragraph was donated by the plaintiff E.

[Reasons for Recognition] The entry of Gap 1-6 and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. Plaintiff A’s assertion and judgment 1) Plaintiff A’s assertion that: (a) the Plaintiff donated each real estate listed in the attached Table 2 to the Defendant on the condition that the Defendant support the Plaintiff, including the Plaintiff’s proposal and payment of living expenses, etc.; and (b) the Defendant did not perform the duty of support by not only finding the Plaintiff’s place of origin but also not paying the Plaintiff’s living expenses; (c) the Plaintiff’s assertion that the gift contract was cancelled and sought for the return of each real estate listed in the attached Table 2 as the restitution to its original state; (d) the donee’s assertion that the donee bears a certain burden, i.e., a certain burden, at the time of receiving the gift; and (e) the donee bears a duty to pay a certain amount of benefit; and (e) there is an agreement between the parties to the contract that any benefit that the donee performed is a father of the gift contract, and accordingly, the donee expected to make a certain benefit and gift to the donee.

Even if such benefit is between the parties.