logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.01.11 2016고단20
업무상배임
Text

The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of this judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

Reasons

1. A summary of the facts charged was selected by Defendant A as the head of the association at its inaugural general meeting of the victim E Housing Redevelopment Project Association (hereinafter “victim E”) around June 25, 201, and the head of the association is a person in charge of overall affairs of the damaged association as the head of the association until now. Defendant B was elected as a general secretary from the time when the committee was organized of the committee for promotion of the damaged association around July 2008, and is a person who conducts the management of the victimized association and the rental business

Meanwhile, on the other hand, with the aim of removing existing buildings with the total area of 24,671 square meters in the project implementation area, improving the residential environment on the site, and contributing to the improvement of the residential stability and the quality of residential life of the association members, the damaged association obtained authorization for the establishment of the association on August 26, 201 through the inaugural general meeting of the association on June 25, 201. On December 10, 2011, the association held an extraordinary general meeting and selected a Si Corporation as G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”), and entered into a contract on December 26, 201 of the same year with I as the company in charge of the “H Maintenance Corporation” (hereinafter “I”), which is a local river at the same general meeting.

As the head of an association or the head of a general secretary-general of a victimized association, the Defendants shall deliberate on the agenda items of the association and the board of representatives submitted to the general meeting and the board of directors in accordance with the articles of association to preserve the assets of the victimized association by making a resolution for the interests of all the union members, and shall not infringe upon the interests of all the union members by executing the contracts imposing a burden on the union members or the project expenses approved by the board of directors, etc. other than those prescribed

1. On December 26, 201, when the injured union entered into a contract with I for the work of occupational breach of trust by paying excessive down payment, authorization for the establishment of the association and its establishment.

arrow