A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 10, 2017, the Defendant: (a) tried to board the victim C (53 tax) who is stopping in front of the Busan Jin-gu B in Busan on May 18:50, 2017 at the rear seat of the D taxi operated by the Defendant.

It is incidental to the repair cost of 250,000 won by unloading the front glass of the above taxi with the stick in possession of the remainder of the cargo that is believed to refuse to take the defective passengers to move to another place.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of recommended punishment] is the general standard for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the grounds for sentencing [the scope of recommended punishment] and the basic area of category 1 (property damage, etc.) [the person who is subject to special sentencing] [the person who is subject to special sentencing] and there is no history of punishment exceeding the fine, the fact that there is no history of punishment exceeding the fine, the fact that damage has not been recovered, the fact that there was no history of recovery from damage, etc.