logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.13 2014가단5081224
양수금
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to Defendant A’s KRW 50,202,495 and KRW 28,554,698 among them:

B. Defendant B is from net G.

Reasons

1. The grounds for the attachment to the indication of the claim and the changed grounds for the claim (1) and (2);

2. Grounds;

(a) Defendant A and E: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

B. Defendant B, D, F, and C: Defendant B, D, and F on September 2, 2015, asserted that the liability is limited since they made a qualified acceptance on the inheritance of the network G’s property through a written response from September 2, 2015. Moreover, the Plaintiff did not claim dismissal of the Plaintiff’s claim. Furthermore, the Plaintiff accepted the qualified acceptance claim by the said Defendants, and reduced the purport of the claim. Accordingly, the said Defendants did not dispute the modified purport of the claim. Therefore, the said Defendants are deemed to have led to the confession of the changed claim and the cause of the claim.

Article 208 (Article 208 (3) 2 of Civil Procedure Act)

arrow