beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On November 25, 2009, the Plaintiff registered as “B: the Plaintiff, the name (representative): the location of the Plaintiff, and the place of business: Jeonnam-gun C and the type of business: Construction business; and operated construction business from the above time.” The Plaintiff stated that the construction business was closed on December 31, 2011 on its business registration certificate.
B. On April 27, 2012, the Defendant filed a report on the establishment of the insurance relationship with the employment insurance and industrial accident compensation insurance (hereinafter “industrial accident insurance”) on the following: (a) on April 27, 2012, the Defendant submitted a report on the establishment of the insurance relationship with the Plaintiff, who is the business owner in B on April 13, 2012, on the following grounds: (b) the Plaintiff: (c) the Defendant newly constructed a house of 129.6 square meters in size on the ground of C and G (hereinafter “instant construction site”); (d) the actual commencement date: April 11, 2012; (b) the scheduled completion date: August 13, 2012; (c) the owner’s name: E; and (d) the Plaintiff’s report on the establishment of the insurance relationship with the Plaintiff, who is the business owner in B, on April 13, 2012; and (d) the Plaintiff’s construction work period of 300,2010.2.
C. Accordingly, on April 30, 2012, the Defendant imposed on the Plaintiff the estimated premium under Article 17(1) of the Act on the Collection, etc. of Insurance Premiums for Employment Insurance and Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance (hereinafter “Employment Insurance Premium Collection Act”), KRW 8,065,00 for industrial accident insurance premiums related to the instant construction site and KRW 2,880,360 for employment insurance premiums, and KRW 2,880 for employment insurance premiums related to the instant construction site. Accordingly, upon the discontinuance of the instant construction project, the Defendant determined to impose insurance premiums on the Plaintiff as much as the ingredients, and reduced the amount of insurance premiums to be imposed on the Plaintiff on June 29, 2012.
Of the insurance premium imposed on the original Plaintiff, it shall be reduced as above.