logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.04.25 2017구합51646
건축신고불수리처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 12, 2016, the Plaintiffs filed a report on the construction of a single house with a total floor area of 88.55 square meters (hereinafter “the instant first building report”) with respect to the Defendant of the amount of 447 square meters and D large 280 square meters (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant land”) prior to Seocho-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

B. On November 11, 2016, the Defendant rendered the instant first building report to the Plaintiffs on the grounds as follows: (a) “A notice of the rejection of the building report” was given to the Plaintiffs.

The land in this case is expected to be removed from the new port and the new port, which is currently being used as a food source as an area for which local waterworks was not supplied, so it is anticipated that water supply, which is an infrastructure, will be difficult to supply. However, the land in this case is not included in the area subject to relocation under the implementation plan for the new port development project under the Harbor Act. However, due to the deterioration of residential environment of E residents due to the new port development project adjacent to the land in this case, the land in this case is completed compensation, and the local residents' relocation complex development project is promoted at the Busan Port Construction Office (Bu Port Corporation). The Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries announced the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries as a planned area for the installation of harbor facilities under the basic harbor plan pursuant to the revised basic harbor plan pursuant to the Act on the Construction and Utilization of Multi-Family Housing under Article 3 and Article 5 of the New Harbor Construction Promotion Act (Act No. 11904, Mar. 20, 2013).

(c).

Plaintiff

A dissatisfied with A, on November 21, 2016, filed an administrative appeal seeking the revocation of the Defendant’s notification of the rejection of a building report with the Standing Committee of Gyeong-do. However, Gyeong-do.

arrow