1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the real estate stated in the attached list.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

1. The Plaintiff, as to the cause of the claim, completed the registration of ownership transfer on October 18, 2007 with respect to the land among the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”), and completed the registration of ownership transfer on November 18, 2014 with respect to the buildings listed in the same list, and the fact that the Defendant occupied each of the said real estate does not dispute between the parties, or that the Defendant possessed each of the said real estate, taking into account the overall purport of entry in the evidence No. 1 and all the arguments, can be acknowledged. According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendant is obligated

2. On June 24, 2013, the defendant asserted that the right to possess the real estate of this case exists since the defendant leased the real estate of this case from the plaintiff from July 1, 2013 to July 24, 2013 by setting the lease term of KRW 30,00,000. Thus, there is no evidence that the defendant paid the lease deposit to the plaintiff. In addition, according to the evidence No. 3 of this case, the lease contract (Evidence No. 2 of this case) that conforms to the above argument is merely made for the submission of the tax office. In light of these facts, in light of these facts, it is insufficient to acknowledge the above evidence No. 2, No. 1, and the testimony of the witness C is insufficient, and there is no evidence to acknowledge it differently. Thus, the above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.