1. Of the damages claims against the Defendants in the judgment of the court of first instance, the following amount shall be paid.

The judgment of the court prior to the remanding of the case after remanding the case, the plaintiff's decision dismissed the plaintiff's claim for the transfer of land to the defendants, the claim for the return of unjust enrichment, and the claim for the return of unjust enrichment, and partly accepted the plaintiff's claim for the return of unjust enrichment and the claim for the return of unjust enrichment.

The Plaintiff and the Defendants appealed. The Supreme Court reversed the part on the claim for damages against the Defendants, and remanded it to this court. The remaining appeals by the Defendants and the Plaintiff’s appeal were dismissed.

Therefore, the remaining part of the plaintiff's claim for damages against the defendants (the plaintiff's claim for land transfer and unjust enrichment return against the defendant, the co-defendant's strengthening group of the first instance court, the transfer of land to Korea and the claim for restitution of unjust enrichment against the defendant) which was reversed and remanded are separately determined by the Supreme Court's decision on the reversal and return, so the subject of the trial is limited to the above reversal

Facts of recognition

The Defendants, including the Defendants of the alteration of forest form and quality, were approved on May 26, 200 after obtaining permission for changing the form and quality of a forest (hereinafter referred to as “instant application site”) from the head of reinforced Gun on January 27, 200 for changing the form and quality of a forest from 4,850 square meters among nine parcels, such as Incheon Strengthening-gun, P, Q, J, G, R, R, S, T, and U (hereinafter “instant application site”); and obtained approval for the completion inspection on May 26, 2003.

After the completion of the instant application, G was changed to W from X to X, R, S and P, Q to P, Z, T and U from AB to AB, and P and J maintained as they were.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant application site”) indicating a specific parcel among the instant application site, shall be indicated only by the previous parcel number. The instant application site and waterway, and the current status of the Plaintiff’s land.