logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2020.11.18 2019나9944
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the facts and images of evidence No. 21 to No. 25, which were additionally submitted by the court of first instance, are insufficient to reverse the facts and judgments recognized by the court of first instance; (b) the facts and images of evidence No. 21 to No. 25 are rejected; and (c) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: (a) the Plaintiff only conducted a boundary restoration survey before the removal of the land (No. 16) and did not conduct a current status survey; (d) the result of the boundary restoration survey alone does not make it difficult to conclude whether the building of this case (the second floor part, the south side part of the first floor) and its affiliated building (North-dong warehouse) intrudes the adjacent land; and (e) it is cited by applying the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act as it is by applying the main sentence

2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow