A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a Croper car at Croper at Croper on a two-lane road in front of the Taean-gun, Cheongan-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Cheongan-gun; (b) changed the two-lane from the Cheongan-gun to the Manpo-si; (c) however, the Defendant changed the two-lanes from the Cheongan-gun, the victim E (21 years old) who driven the Droper car at a two-lane; (d) stopped on the side and stopped on the side, and followed the victim’s blade (27 cm in total, 15 cm in length, 15 cm in order to see the victim’s and the victim’s knick to the above knoper; and (e) changed the two-lane, the Defendant called the victim’s knoper and the victim’s knick to the above knoper and the victim’s k.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles, and threatened victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A list of seizure records (voluntary submission), and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as black booms, video CDs, and photographs of damaged vehicles;

1. Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act, despite the fact that the Defendant was punished as a crime of violating the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective deadly weapon, etc.), the Defendant committed the instant crime of the same kind at the same time, which is disadvantageous to the Defendant, or even though the Defendant changed his direction, continued to turn on the back the victims, etc. even though he changed his direction.