logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.30 2015가단5379652
대여금
Text

1. The plaintiff

A. Defendant A and Defendant B jointly and severally with Company D, as well as KRW 3,041,00,000,000, respectively, and as a result, November 14, 201.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

(However, the “creditor” is deemed to be the “Plaintiff”, the “debtor” to be the “Defendant”, and the payment order was already finalized in demand proceedings with respect to Company D). - The amount of the claim against the Defendants thereafter was reduced within the scope of the guarantee limit by each guarantor.

2.(a)

Judgment by public notice of Defendant A and Defendant C (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

B. Judgment by Defendant B (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act) - The Defendant, after being served with the authentic copy of the payment order, filed a formal objection against the payment order, and did not submit any specific reply disputing the Plaintiff’s assertion and did not appear on the date of pleading. Therefore, it is deemed that the Plaintiff led to the confession of the Plaintiff’s assertion in accordance with Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act.

arrow