A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around May 12, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C, stating that “The dynamics of Songpa-gu E in Seoul E, would have been indoor in person,” to the victim C, at a D office operated by the victim C in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul, to enter into a cleaning service contract for seven months if the Defendant borrowed KRW 10 million.”

However, there is no fact that the defendant's birth entered into an indoor interior interior interior test contract for the building, and even if the defendant borrows money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to allow the victim to enter into a cleaning service contract for the building.

Nevertheless, the Defendant deceiving the victim as above and received from the victim i.e., KRW 10 million.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a cleaning service contract and a performance assurance contract;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 347 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act: (a) considering the fact that the amount of damage caused by the sentencing of Article 62-2(1) of the same Act is extremely low in extenuating circumstances, the execution of sentence shall be suspended by taking into account the fact that the person was selected to be sentenced to imprisonment, the repayment of 2.6 million won was made, and there was no criminal record of the same kind of crime; (b) although the defendant was under criminal conciliation, he did not perform his promise, and the remainder of damage