beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 119,489,70 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from October 23, 2014 to May 29, 2015 for the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a company established on June 12, 2012, that mainly engages in the production, distribution, processing, and sale of agricultural products, and that cultivates poppy in large-scale electric batteries and supplies them to the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “Plaintiff company”). The Defendant is a person who sells agricultural materials and agricultural chemicals in the trade name of C, and D agricultural partnership (hereinafter “D”) is a company that distributes poppy.
B. 1) The Plaintiff has produced and supplied the actual sulphal wave from August 2012 to D, and even August 12, 2013, a contract for the quantitative cultivation with the following content (hereinafter “instant bilateral cultivation contract”).
A) A) B. B. B. B. H. and B. B. B. P. H. H. H. H. H. and seven parcels: 54,000 square meters: 1,575,000 g (75,000 g): The actual market price: The actual market price: 51,250 won per kg: 51,250,000 won: D on August 12, 2013, pursuant to the two-wave white contract of this case, on August 12, 2013, the Plaintiff paid KRW 165,375,000, the contract price of the Plaintiff on August 30, 2012, the total of KRW 110,250,000,275,2705,2705,600, the contract price of intermediate payment as of December 30, 2012.
C. On February 7, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with D on a low temperature warehouse with respect to the low temperature warehouse owned by the Plaintiff for the purpose of keeping the fachis (hereinafter “instant fachis”) produced under the instant quantitative cultivation contract (hereinafter “instant fachis”). The Plaintiff was paid KRW 20,000,000 for the down payment from D during the period from June 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014.
The representative director F of the Plaintiff’s spraying 1 Plaintiff frequently requested the Defendant to provide advice on quantitative cultivation skills. The Defendant visited the Plaintiff’s cultivated land and consulted on the initial growth ecology of the seedlings, etc. at the above request, and sold agrochemicals to the Plaintiff while selling agrochemicals.