The accused shall announce the summary of the judgment of innocence.

1. The defendant and the victim D (the age of 54) are legally married couple in December 1984.

The Defendant, in the Changwon District Court Jinwon Branch case 2015 Jinwon Branch 62, extended the Defendant to December 4, 2015 the measure of isolation, prohibition of access, and prohibition of access using telecommunications by December 22, 2016.

“Ad hoc measures were determined to extend ad hoc measures.”

On January 16, 2016, around 13:30 on January 16, 2016, when the victim was invaded by E 143 in Jinju where the victim was living, but was discovered by the victim, and was trying to flee by operating the Flute vehicle, which is one of his own vehicles, the injured person was unable to stop the front of the said vehicle, and the victim was able to walk.

The part of the above vehicle, which is a dangerous object, was driven by the victim's lux part in front of the vehicle, and the victim's lux part was shocked once and the victim's luxal part was faced with about 21 days for medical treatment.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the record of judgment, the evidence alone submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim due to the shock of the victim by vehicle, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge the injury.

A. The victim, in an investigative agency and this court, "the victim prevented the victim from driving his/her vehicle while the defendant was moving his/her vehicle back, changed the direction of the proceeding, and the victim re-afforested the course of the proceeding, leaving the victim away from about 1.5 meters from the victim.

While G stated to the purport that “A witness of this case by the victim’s birth” was the victim, G left a vehicle by the victim, and the victim was driving the vehicle, and the victim was pushed ahead of the vehicle at the time when the victim was driving away the vehicle of the defendant, and the defendant was faced with the victim in the future.

‘The statement was made to the effect that it was ‘.'

The contents of each of the above statements are far away from the victim.