1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part A and the part C of the defendant school foundation, including a claim expanded in the trial, are as follows.

Facts of recognition

Plaintiff

A major graduate from a graduate school of the F University on February 1979, and graduated from a graduate school of the F University on October 1982 and received a doctor’s degree in Germany on April 1990.

Plaintiff

B is the wife of Plaintiff A.

The Defendant School Foundation C (hereinafter “Defendant Corporation”) is a school foundation that establishes and operates a F University. Article 13 of the Regulations on the Personnel Management of Teaching Staff of Defendant Corporation provides that “In principle, a faculty member in charge of new subjects in a new subject and a senior subject in a new subject education division shall be subject to paragraph (1) of this Article (in principle, a senior subject who respects the ideology of the establishment of the F University) and paragraph (3) of this Article (in principle, a person who has experience in a regular course of not less than three years, who falls under paragraph (1) of this Article (in principle, a person who has obtained doctor’s degree).”

Around July 6, 1991, the Defendant corporation invited professors of the major of the F University’sology, church history, and the publication was required as “owner of a wooden club experience for at least three years as a pastor.”

Plaintiff

A on July 10, 1991, the defendant corporation himself " from March 1979 to July 4, 1982, he was Jindogian, and on April 26, 1991, he received a pastor from Kinno Association, and had the career of assistant pastors from May 191 to N innuri.

“Along with the resume of the content, “A” was submitted, and a career certificate issued under the name of the president L of the N branch of the N branch of the N branch of the N branch of the National Assembly (hereinafter “instant career certificate”). On August 26, 191, the Defendant corporation newly appointed Plaintiff A as an associate professor at the F University Department of the National University on condition that the Plaintiff had a past three years’ experience, and appointed as an associate professor on October 1, 1995, and appointed as a professor on October 16, 2001. The Defendant corporation took three-month disciplinary action against Plaintiff A on February 16, 2009 against the Plaintiff. The reason for the disciplinary action was “Violation of the duty of dignity as a professor, such as sending inappropriate e-mail with respect to the same teaching faculty, etc.”, “Violation of the duty of care as a professor, as a member of the N branch of the National Assembly of the National Assembly of Labor Union”, and “performance of duty as a member of the faculty and a new faculty.