logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.04.14 2015구합13109
등록취소처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

가. 원고는 2001. 3. 6. 태성종합건설 유한회사라는 상호로 설립되어 2009. 2. 2. 토목건축공사업 등록을 하였고, 2015. 2. 3. 현재의 상호로 변경되었다.

B. On the other hand, on February 17, 2012, the Plaintiff was subject to a disposition of business suspension for a period of four months on the grounds that the Plaintiff failed to meet the registration criteria for construction business (capital).

C. On March 17, 2015, the Plaintiff submitted a report on the registered matters of construction business to the Do Association, Jeonnam-do (hereinafter “Construction Association”) pursuant to Article 10-2(2) of the Enforcement Rule of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry for periodic reporting on matters concerning the registration standards of construction business.

건설협회는 2015. 6. 19. 피고에게 원고의 2014년도 재무제표를 기준으로 ‘2015. 6. 12. 현재 토목건축공사업 등록기준 심사결과 원고의 자본금 부족을 확인함(토목건축공사업에 필요한 자본금 12억 원 중 701,291,686원 부족)’이라는 내용의 건설업등록사항신고서 심사결과를 통보하였다.

E. On October 21, 2015, the Defendant’s disposition of cancellation of registration pursuant to Article 83 subparag. 3-3 of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry on the ground that the Plaintiff falls short of the criteria for registration of construction business (capital).

[The facts that there is no dispute over the basis for recognition, Gap evidence 5, Eul evidence 1 and 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings.]

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion of this case should be revoked as it is unlawful in that it is below.

1) The Plaintiff’s certificate of the details of each member transaction account, deposit and loan transaction certificate, and deposit balance certificate of the Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Saemaul Bank (hereinafter “Counterfeited document”).

Since the construction association has filed a periodic report on the criteria for registration of construction business with no knowledge of forgery, there is a justifiable reason for failing to file a periodic report in accordance with Article 81 subparagraph 2 of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry, and Article 83 subparagraph 3-2 of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry.

arrow