logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.02.18 2015나2058370
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is that "the plaintiff and the defendant shall submit an application for divorce pursuant to agreement to the Australian Court" in Part 6, Part 5 through 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be that "the plaintiff and the defendant shall submit an application for divorce pursuant to agreement to the Australian Court" shall be deemed to be "the plaintiff and the defendant shall have maintained a marital relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant for not less than two years and seven months after the agreement of this case, as seen above, and that "the marital relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant shall be maintained" shall be deemed to have been maintained in the above part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and shall be deemed to have been suspended from the plaintiff's property under the name of the plaintiff and the defendant's title trust, and shall not be deemed to have existed in the above part of the judgment of the court of first instance since the plaintiff and the defendant shall re-examine the agreement of this case, and shall be deemed to have been owned by the plaintiff and the defendant's property division under the same purport as the plaintiff's property division of this case or the plaintiff's property division of this case."

2. Supplementary judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion.

arrow