Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, the defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are not narcotics handlers.

On April 2015, at around 12:00, Defendant A sold the ground of Homi, Defendant A, and Defendant B, in advance, sold the seeds of marijuana in his possession, and the same year.

9. By August 9, 200, the hemp 17 states were cultivated together.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to cultivate marijuana.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs, pictures and narcotics appraisal certificates as at the time of seizure of marijuana;

1. Article 61(1)6 and Article 4(1)2 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. In light of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the following circumstances, including the Defendants’ age, sex, environment, and circumstances leading to the commission of the crime.

[Defendant A] Unfavorable circumstances: The fact that he again committed the instant crime even though he had the record of punishment for the same kind of crime two times, and that he committed the instant crime, and that he was favorable to the larger amount of the cultivated marijuana: [Defendant B]’s unfavorable circumstances: The circumstances that are favorable to the larger amount of the cultivated marijuana: the fact that there is no record of the same kind of punishment, and the fact that