A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On January 12, 2019, the Defendant: (a) at the waiting room for the guardian of the hospital located in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon on January 12, 2019; (b) at the care room for the guardian of the hospital located in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, the victim D, who is security personnel of the above hospital, walked the Si expenses to the victim D; and (c) at the time; and (d) at the time, I am son son son son son son son son son son son son son son, but son son son son son son son son son son, but son son son son son son’s son son son, but son son son son’s son son, but son son son son son son son son son son son son son, the Defendant son son son son son son son her son son son her, and son son.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the security of the victim's hospital by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of field photographs, ctv caps and video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 314 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Articles 10(2) and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of mental disorders;

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment for not more than two years and not more than six months;

2. Scope of recommendations based on the sentencing guidelines: Imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months and up to one year and six months (decision of type): There is no type 1 (Interference with Business) (Special Obstruction of Business) (Scope of Recommendation and Recommendation) (Scope of Recommendation) - Basic area - Imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months to one year and six months.

3. Determination of sentence: The same sentence as the disposition shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the specific circumstances as described below eight months of imprisonment, and all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the pleadings in this case, such as the age, character and conduct and environment of the accused.

The defendant recognized the crime of this case and expressed the intention of reflect as to the mistake, and the fact that it was caused to the crime of this case in the state of the state of the taking is favorable to the defendant.

However, the defendant on May 24, 2017.