logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.19 2017고단3787
교통사고처리특례법위반(치사)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a G K7 car.

On March 1, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 01:15, and driven the road of four-lanes in front of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, with four-lanes in the direction of Gangnam-gu, Seoul, at a speed of about 97km in the direction of Gangnam-gu History.

At the time, it is night and its place is 60 km speed, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by complying with the speed limit and properly manipulating the steering and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant failed to discover the victim I (54) who crosses the speed from the left side of the running direction of the Defendant at a speed exceeding about 37 km by neglecting this, and did not discover the victim I (54 ) who crosses the speed from the left side of the driving direction of the Defendant, and let the victim I go above the ground by taking the right side of the victim I into the front side of the driving of the Defendant, and continuously shock the victim J (35 years old) who was going to get a taxi at the right side of the road into the front right side of the said vehicle, and continuously shocked the victim K (33 years old)'s right side of the right side of the vehicle into the front wheels of the said vehicle.

Ultimately, according to the distribution of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, where the victim I was under medical treatment after around 03:43 on March 1, 2017 due to the above occupational negligence, the suspect caused the victim I's death of the victim I due to the damage of the number of water caused by the clifation by the clifation of the clif in the 222, and the victim J. suffered from the victim K's injury of the clifed clif in the right-hand clif, the right-hand clif, the right-hand clif in need of the clif treatment for about 3 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of each traffic accident;

1. A death certificate;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the traffic accident analysis report;

arrow