A fine of two million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On June 15, 2016, the Defendant attended the Busan District Court No. 353, located in Busan District Court, 15,000, as a witness, on June 15, 2016, on the case of violation of the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name as to the above Court No. 2016 and No. 888, as a witness.

On June 11, 201, the instant case purchased from E a building of 4 billion won above the ground level of 1st century (hereinafter “instant real estate”) under the ground level of 331.6 square meters in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si D, 31.6 square meters, and its ground-based reinforced concrete sponser, for KRW 70 million, and entered into a trust agreement under the name of F with F, the title of which is the trustee in the name of F, and then entered into on July 11, 201, the instant real estate in the name of F, the trustee, for the instant real estate in machinery, such as Changwon-si, Changwon District Court Msan Branch support, etc.

6. 15. The Defendant was aware of the fact that the real owner of the instant real estate was C throughout several times from early 2014, by completing the registration of transfer of ownership on the ground of sale and purchase.

Nevertheless, the defendant's "I am in the name of C C C, F at that time, and the owner was in fact the name of C himself.

We do not hear the question “in fact,” and they do not see, and they do not need to do so.

“The testimony was made.”

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Three times the public trial records;

1. A protocol of examination of the witness, a written oath of testimony, and a record book (A);

1. Court rulings (2016 High Court rulings 888);

1. The written complaint (1) and the written indictment (13) and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 152 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. The sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse is a criminal who interferes with the discovery of substantial truth and thus infringes on the judicial power of the State. The crime of this case is the key part of the trial.