The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the lower court (one year and eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. There is no change in the terms and conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and where the sentencing of the first instance does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). Based on the foregoing legal doctrine, there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared with the lower court on the grounds that new materials for sentencing have not been submitted in the trial, and in full view of the factors revealed in the arguments in the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing was too too excessive and exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

It does not appear.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, the prosecutor of the original decision shall be corrected as adding "this red, highest leather, Kim Jong-m, Lee Jong-m, Lee Jong-m, Lee Jong-m, Lee Jong-m, Lee Jong-m, Lee Ho-m, Lee's territory to the following."