1. The defendant

(a) deliver a part of the restaurant recorded in the attached list;

B. From August 27, 2014, the foregoing.

According to the purport of the arguments and arguments, C: (a) on May 12, 2011, delivered to the Defendant a deposit of five million won; (b) KRW 350,000 won per month; and (c) five years; and (d) the rent was increased by 400,000 won per month from January 12, 2012; (c) the Defendant delayed payment of rent from August 12, 2013; (d) C died on January 3, 2016; and (e) the Plaintiff succeeded to the building indicated in the order as the wife by agreement division; and (e) the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant a certificate that he/she should deliver the part of the restaurant indicated in the order to the Defendant on March 23, 2016 to the expiration of the above period (i.e., delivery of the foregoing part to the Plaintiff at the rate of KRW 760,000,000,000,000,000 to KRW 4,516.

On October 1, 2011, the Defendant entrusted D with the part of the restaurant indicated in the order, and thereafter C 2012

1. From December, 12 to 400,000 won per month, the defendant transferred all the rights and obligations as a tenant to D. Thus, the defendant asserts that the lawsuit in this case should be dismissed. However, the defendant's standing in the lawsuit for demanding performance is a person for whom the plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff has a duty to perform, and whether the plaintiff's assertion is reasonable or not. Thus, the above argument itself is without merit.

Even if it is alleged that he does not have any obligation to perform as a claim on the merits, the defendant dated September 30, 201 between the defendant (A) and D (B) attached to the written answer.