Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 18, 2016, at around 14:20 on August 18, 2016, the Defendant damaged the property by destroying the reinforced glass in the front wall of the treatment room in his/her hands to the victim I (35 tax) who is the head of the above veterinary hospital, which is the head of the above veterinary hospital (35 tax), for a refund. However, the victim requested a refund to the victim I (35 tax) who is the head of the above veterinary hospital, but on the ground that he/she refused a refund, the Defendant destroyed the property so that the market value would be excessive.

2. The injured Defendant: (a) destroyed the instant accident at the time and place of reinforcement glass; and (b) demanded compensation from the victim of the defect intending to go back to the back of the hospital; and (c) prevented the police from leaving the victim’s body up to time before the clerical error; and (d) prevented the Defendant from leaving the victim’s body more than once by making the police tightly divided the victim’s body more than once; and (b) caused the victim to be sprinked on the left side of the hospital, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of I and J;

1. A criminal investigation report (in cases of dispatch to the scene);

1. On-site reports;

1. The written diagnosis of injury (the defendant and his defense counsel argued that the book on which the defendant was locked in favor of the defendant was dried up and the book was deed up under the bottom, and that there was no intention of damage as it was damaged by the glass, but that the book was in contact with the shoulder of the defendant;

Even if it is difficult to see that the glass be damaged or the floor fall, it is difficult to see that the glass be damaged, the glass bed is located inside the outer wall of the decoration, and is made of a reinforced glass, and appears to have sufficient thickness, strength, and weight. The glass bed in this case is made up of a structure that can easily fall from the bottom to the hands, and as long as it is difficult to leave the glass bed from the support stand, the above argument is rejected as it is without merit.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.