A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was a person who worked as an insurance solicitor of interesting country from around 2008 to 2011, and the victim C was a person who was insured introduced by the defendant as the defendant's branch.

1. On January 201, 201, the Defendant made a false statement that “The Defendant shall pay other clients’ insurance money due to performance, if he/she lends money to another customer” at the interesting life office located in the Nam-gu Incheon Arts, Nam-gu, Incheon.

However, in fact, the Defendant, from around 2010 to enter into a new insurance contract with a view to attracting or recontracting insurance products, paid at the expense of the Defendant’s customer’s insurance premium, borrowed money from other customers to cover the above insurance premium, or maintained it in the so-called “competing” manner, and there was no intent or ability to repay the premium even if he borrowed money from the victim.

The Defendant received from the victim a remittance of KRW 2,914,67 as a sum of KRW 827,967, around February 1, 2011, KRW 2,914,679, around June 1, 2011, including KRW 2,086,712.

2. On March 201, 201, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim, “I will pay the interest of KRW 50,000,000 per month and return the principal at the time of the request for the repayment of the principal,” at the interest office for the said interest country’s life, “I would like to make an investment of real estate by Sacheon-do New City. I would like to make an investment by making an investment in Sacheon-do New City. I would not make an investment because I would like to make a big profit. I would like to make an investment by making an investment in

However, in fact, the defendant did not make an investment in real estate, he thought that he would have received the above money and used it to pay the premium in substitute, and there was no intention or ability to return the said money due to the lack of circumstances at the time.

The Defendant, from March 29, 201, to July 22, 2011, is in total as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form from March 29, 2011 to the victim.