logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.07.12 2017고단4681
후천성면역결핍증예방법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 11, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to three years to imprisonment with prison labor for murder at the Daejeon District Court, and on December 28, 2017, the above judgment became final and conclusive as it is.

No person infected with AIDS shall intermediate radio waves to another person through blood or body fluids.

On July 5, 2010, the Defendant was judged to have been aware of the fact that he suffered from AIDS in 1,000.

Nevertheless, on May 2, 2017, the Defendant did not notify the victim C of the fact that he/she is infected with AIDS infections, and, on May 2, 2017, at around 02:54, sexual intercourses between the victim and the victim in the E room located in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, such as sexual intercourses between the victim and the victim through the body fluids. From around that time to June 26, 2017, the Defendant had sexual intercourses over a total of 11 times, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

(The defendant and his defense counsel notified the fact that the defendant himself is a person infected with infections in the aftermathic scarcitys and used the scarcitys, and dispute the criminal liability for the crime.

According to the above evidence, C consistently did not have a sexual relationship if he knew of the fact that the Defendant was infected with her from the 10th day after the Defendant’s delivery and that sexual intercourse occurred from the 10th day after the Defendant’s delivery, and that she did not have a sexual intercourse if she knew of the fact that she was infected with her sexual intercourse.

statement is made.

In addition, I first known the fact that the defendant was infected by the investigator on the day of the crime of final judgment in the judgment, and also stated that the defendant was injured by the final judgment in the judgment in the next year.

Although the statement of the defendant and C is contrary to the statement of the defendant, it is difficult to find reasons for not reliance on C's statement.

Therefore, the defendant and defense counsel's assertion are not accepted.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1.With respect to C:

arrow