beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment of one year and two months, by imprisonment of six months, and by a fine of three million won, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
On June 1, 2017, A and B, respectively, were sentenced to the suspension of the execution of the imprisonment of 8 months for a crime of violation of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection (Leakage of Personal Information, etc.) in the support of the Daejeon District Court on 1, 2017, and the decision was finalized on June 9, 2017
1. Defendant A and B conspired to make a payment of a small amount of mobile phone in their names against many unspecified persons through the Internet advertisement called “purchase of a small amount of mobile merchandise coupon, etc.” and to sell it to the wholesale merchant and obtain the difference. Defendant A and B conspired to take charge of the role of opening the Internet homepage and posting advertisements, and Defendant B are in contact with the above applicants to purchase the said merchandise coupon, etc. and transfer the money after deducting approximately 10-15% of the payment of the small amount of mobile merchandise from the fee. Defendant B conspired to take charge of the role of purchasing the said merchandise coupon and remitting the money.
No one shall lend funds through communications and gold services, or have communications and gold service users purchase and use goods, etc. through communications and gold services, and lend funds through purchase at a discount by a user of telecommunications and gold services after pretending to sell goods, etc.
However, on August 1, 2016, the Defendants: (a) opened an Internet homepage “G” (H) and “I” (J); and (b) purchased a small amount of mobile merchandise coupon, etc. on the Internet on the Internet; and (c) sent a fin number or coo number of mobile merchandise coupons, etc. that he/she paid to his/her mobile phone via a mobile phone; and (b) received from K, which had contacted, about 10-15% of the fee from the said settlement amount.